Top Blaze.tech Alternatives for Business Applications in 2026

Looking for Blaze.tech alternatives? The strongest options for business applications combine unlimited users, enterprise compliance (HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, FERPA), embeddable deployment on your own domain, and a mature database backbone. Caspio leads the list. Bubble.io, Retool, Glide, Softr, and Knack each fit narrower buyer profiles, with documented trade-offs that matter at scale.

Best for: Mid-market and enterprise buyers evaluating Blaze.tech who need stronger compliance posture (HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II annually independently certified, FERPA), unlimited users at any scale, embeddable applications on their own domain, and a vendor with a 26-year track record.

Blaze.tech earned its place on shortlists by leaning into AI-assisted no-code app building. Once buyers move past prototyping and into production, especially in healthcare, finance, education, or any application with thousands of end users, the gaps show up. Compliance ceilings, per-seat creep, and a four-year company history start to weigh against a multi-year IT contract. This guide ranks the alternatives, explains what each one does, and pairs every claim with the documented limitation that follows it.

Why Buyers Are Looking for Blaze.tech Alternatives

Founded in 2022, Blaze.tech is a no-code platform for internal tools, customer portals, and AI-assisted business applications. It markets to healthcare teams, operations, financial services, and IT departments, the same audience Caspio has served since 2000.

When buyers go looking for an alternative, the reasons cluster:

• Compliance ceiling. Blaze publicly markets HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 2, and HITRUST e1 certification, with a strong healthcare focus. The trade-offs that drive buyers to evaluate alternatives are pricing (HIPAA capabilities are gated to Enterprise tiers, with the HIPAA Core plan reportedly starting around $999/month per third-party comparisons), the absence of public FERPA alignment, and a narrower compliance set than mature enterprise vendors for non-healthcare regulated workloads.
• Vendor maturity. Less than five years on the market is short for a multi-year enterprise contract. More often than not, CIOs evaluating decade-plus commitments want a longer track record.
• Per-tier end-user caps and entry pricing. Blaze tiers cap maker seats and end-user activity. Public pricing starts at $1,350/month (annual) or $1,500/month (monthly) on the Internal Apps tier, with external users gated to a custom Enterprise tier. Apps that succeed often outgrow the tier they were sized for, and the next tier moves the bill up sharply.
• AI depth. Blaze leans on AI-assisted building. Caspio’s three AI capabilities (AI-Powered GPT Connect extension, MCP Server, and AI Assistant) go further: full LLM integration into workflows and an MCP server that connects business data to Claude, ChatGPT, and other agents.
• Deployment flexibility. Blaze apps run primarily on Blaze infrastructure under Blaze-controlled URLs. Caspio gives you both options: fully hosted standalone apps via Flex (Caspio’s modern framework with built-in header, navigation, and one-click deployment) or embeddable components via Bridge, all on your own domain.
• Database backbone. Blaze runs on Blaze Tables, the platform’s native no-code database. Caspio runs on Microsoft SQL Server on AWS, the database lineage enterprise IT often standardizes on for relational, high-volume workloads.
• Support depth. Caspio offers 24/7 human support across all paid plans, with named Professional Services available for migrations and complex builds. Blaze’s support model is documented as responsive in customer reviews, but the depth and 24/7 cadence on every paid plan is part of why mature enterprise vendors are evaluated against newer entrants.

Top 6 Blaze.tech Alternatives

The shortlist below ranks the alternatives that close those gaps, with Caspio first, where the gap closes most smoothly. Each platform is evaluated on six dimensions: compliance certifications (HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II independently certified annually, FERPA, GDPR), pricing model (per-seat creep vs. flat platform pricing), embeddable deployment, database backbone, AI capabilities, and support and vendor maturity.

Rankings reflect enterprise-grade buyer needs. Platforms that rank lower may still fit a specific narrow use case, and each card calls out the buyer profile it actually serves, plus the published limitations that come with it.

1. Caspio, The Top Blaze.tech Alternative for Enterprise Applications

   The Blaze.tech alternative for mid-market and enterprise teams that need flat platform pricing, embeddable apps on their own domain, and deep compliance certifications.

   Positioning. Caspio is the enterprise-grade no-code platform for building secure, embeddable database applications. Founded in 2000 and trusted by 15,000+ global customers in healthcare, government, education, and the Fortune 500, Caspio is the build-once, scale-forever alternative to Blaze.tech for organizations that take compliance, embeddability, and unlimited-user economics seriously.

   Pricing. Starting from $300/month. The Team plan is $300/month, Business is $600/month, and Enterprise is available for a custom quote. HIPAA/Compliance is available as a separate add-on at $500/month with a 1-year minimum term. 14-day free trial is available. 10% nonprofit discount. 10% annual billing discount. No free plan.

   Best for. Mid-market and enterprise organizations, especially in healthcare, finance, education, and government, that need a no-code platform with HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II compliance, FERPA alignment, unlimited users at any scale, embeddable apps and components on their own domain, and a 26-year vendor track record.

   Key features:

   • Unlimited users on every plan. No per-seat fees on builders or end users. The 10,000-customer or 100,000-customer scenario stays at flat platform pricing.
   • HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II, independently certified annually. Full set of compliance, along with FERPA for education, GDPR, PCI DSS, and FIPS 140-2. AWS GovCloud and private-cloud options for sensitive deployments.
   • Flexible deployment. With Flex, Caspio fully hosts standalone applications complete with header, navigation, and footer, deployable with one click on your own domain. With Bridge, Caspio applications and components embed natively into your existing website, portal, or intranet under your own domain. Either way: no vendor subdomain, no brand handoff.
   • Microsoft SQL Server on AWS backbone. The database lineage enterprise IT standardizes on. Supports millions of records and thousands of concurrent users per application.
   • AI capabilities. AI-Powered GPT Connect is a native extension that connects OpenAI’s language models to Caspio data and workflows. The Caspio MCP Server connects Caspio data and actions to AI assistants like Claude and ChatGPT via the Model Context Protocol. The AI Assistant generates database structures and DataPage logic from plain-language prompts, with broader app-design capabilities expanding over time.
   • Integrations. REST API, webhooks, Zapier, Make, n8n, and Keragon (healthcare). A broad integration set in this comparison.
   • 24/7 human support on all paid plans. Real engineers, not chatbots. Plus Professional Services and a partner network for migrations and complex builds.
   • SAML SSO (in and out) on select plans for enterprise identity integration.

   Limitations / when not to choose Caspio. Caspio is purpose-built for secure, data-driven business applications. If your priority is a pixel-perfect consumer-facing mobile app or a SaaS MVP where design control matters more than database depth, evaluate Bubble.io with eyes open about its workload-pricing exposure. If your team is engineering-led and willing to write JavaScript on top of existing databases, Retool fits that narrow internal-tools scenario.

   Compared to Blaze.tech. Caspio offers broader compliance breadth across regulated industries (HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II compliance + FERPA alignment for education, where Blaze leans toward HIPAA + HITRUST e1 for healthcare specifically), unlimited users vs. Blaze’s tiered end-user caps, flexible deployment on your own domain (fully hosted Flex apps or embeddable Bridge components) vs. Blaze’s hosted-on-Blaze model, a Microsoft SQL Server backbone vs. Blaze Tables (Blaze’s native no-code database), deeper AI capabilities (MCP server, AI Assistant, AI-Powered GPT Connect), and a 26-year vendor track record vs. four.

2. Bubble.io, Fits Consumer Web Apps and SaaS MVPs

   A Blaze.tech alternative considered for consumer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs.

   Positioning. Bubble.io is a visual web app builder for full-stack web applications and SaaS products, with a native iOS/Android mobile builder added in public beta in 2025. Founded in 2012 in NYC, it is used by founders, indie SaaS builders, and product teams shipping consumer-facing web (and now, mobile) apps.

   Pricing. Free tier with limits. Starter $29/month annual (175K workload units). Growth $119/month annual (250K workload units). Team $349/month annual (500K workload units). Enterprise custom. Pricing combines a base subscription with workload units (compute capacity), and overages run $0.30 per 1,000 units beyond the monthly allocation, which routinely pushes real costs above headline figures as the app scales.

   Best for. Consumer-facing web apps and SaaS MVPs with growing native mobile support, where design control matters more than compliance, scale, or database depth, and the team is prepared to manage workload-unit overages and a heavily community-built plugin ecosystem.

   Key features and the documented limitation that follows each:

   • Drag-and-drop visual editor with design flexibility, but community discussions have long flagged gaps in core features, most notably the lack of native PDF generation (users rely on third-party plugins like CraftMyPDF). Bubble has been actively closing these gaps, though some legacy areas still lag newer no-code platforms.
   • A 7,000+ plugin marketplace, but only 57 are partner-built. The remaining 6,900+ are community-submitted, with recurring complaints about duplicate plugins, abandoned plugins with no maintainer, no service-level guarantees from third-party developers, and stacking paid-plugin fees that can exceed the Bubble subscription itself.
   • API connector and webhook support.
   • SOC 2 Type II compliance at the platform level verified by an independent audit.
   • HIPAA via a Dedicated or Enterprise plan only; doesn’t sign standardized BAAs.

   Limitations. Workload-based pricing is the headline issue. Workload-unit overages at $0.30 per 1,000 units accumulate quickly on data-heavy apps, and live Bubble apps commonly run $200 to $1,500/month all-in once traffic scales, before consultant or agency build costs. HIPAA is gated to Dedicated/Enterprise. No FERPA. The SQL backbone enterprise IT prefers is not present.

   Compared to Blaze.tech. Bubble has more UI/UX flexibility and a larger nominal ecosystem, but the workload pricing introduces the same kind of cost unpredictability buyers are escaping when they leave Blaze, and the heavily community-built plugin catalog (only 57 of 6,000+ entries are partner-built) carries documented maintenance and SLA gaps compared to first-party integration sets.

3. Retool, Fits Engineering Teams Building Internal Admin Tools

   A Blaze.tech alternative considered for engineering-led teams building internal admin tools.

   Positioning. Retool is an internal tools platform for engineering teams. Founded in 2017 in San Francisco, it lets developers (and partially-trained non-developers) build admin panels, dashboards, and operational workflows on top of existing databases and APIs.

   Pricing. Free for up to 5 users. Team $10/user/month with end-user usage tiers. Business $50/user/month. Enterprise, the only tier that includes HIPAA, source control, and on-premise deployment, is available via custom quote. Per-seat pricing on builder/maker seats, plus end-user volume on certain plans.

   Best for. Engineering teams that already write SQL and JavaScript and need an internal-only admin layer over existing databases. Not a fit for citizen developers, business users, or external/customer-facing applications.

   Key features and the documented limitation that follows each:

   • 70+ native database, API, and SaaS integrations, for internal use only. Retool is positioned squarely at internal tools, not customer-facing applications.
   • Self-hosted option, but only on the Enterprise tier.
   • Retool AI for AI-assisted query and code generation, which still assumes a developer can read and edit the generated JavaScript and SQL.
   • SOC 2 Type II certification.
   • HIPAA path via self-hosted Enterprise deployment. Per Retool’s own Customer-Specific Supplement, Retool does not sign a standard BAA. The practical HIPAA path is deploying Retool self-hosted on the Enterprise tier, where the customer takes on compliance responsibility for the underlying infrastructure.

   Limitations. Per-seat pricing on builder seats compounds quickly, with partners and SMB users publicly citing per-seat costs as a reason they can’t bring Retool to their own customers. The “no-code” framing has been challenged in third-party reviews: SQL and JavaScript skills are required for anything beyond trivial flows. Source control and Git integration are gated to Enterprise. Direct customer support is also gated to Enterprise; lower tiers rely on community forum responses. No native HIPAA/FERPA story. Not architected for external/customer-facing applications.

   Compared to Blaze.tech. Retool provides more advanced database integrations and self-hosting capabilities than Blaze.tech, making it a strong fit for engineering-led teams. However, its developer-oriented approach may present a steeper learning curve for non-technical users and is primarily designed for internal tools rather than external applications.

4. Glide, Fits Lightweight Mobile-First Internal Apps

   A Blaze.tech alternative considered for lightweight mobile-first internal apps.

   Positioning. Glide is a no-code, mobile-first app builder originally driven by spreadsheets. Founded in 2018, it is used for lightweight team apps, internal directories, and field-facing mobile tools.

   Pricing. Free tier. Maker $25/month. Team $99/month (20 users included, $5/user/month after). Business $249/month (30 users included, $5–6/user/month after). Enterprise custom. Update overages run $0.02 per update beyond the monthly allocation.

   Best for. Small internal mobile apps with bounded data volume and a small bounded user count, where the team can absorb per-user fees as the app grows.

   Key features and the documented limitation that follows each:

   • Mobile-first design, but no native publishing path to the Apple App Store or Google Play.
   • Glide AI for in-app intelligence.
   • SOC 2 Type II certification at the platform level; audit report and enterprise security artifacts (SLAs, custom terms, domain monitoring) are part of the Enterprise tier.
   • Not HIPAA-compliant. Glide does not sign BAAs, and its own Terms of Service explicitly prohibit storing Protected Health Information (PHI) covered by HIPAA in any Glide app. Healthcare applications handling PHI need a platform with a signed BAA.

   Limitations. Per-user fees stack on top of the base subscription, and a 50-person team on the Business plan typically runs around $300/month once user overages are factored in. Apps that scale into hundreds of public users hit Glide’s pricing ceiling fast, and community case studies document teams that outgrew the platform and rebuilt natively. Update overages add another variable cost line on heavily synced apps. Embeddability into existing websites is limited. Compliance posture is incomplete. Its Terms of Service prohibit storing PHI in any Glide app, ruling it out for HIPAA workloads, and there’s no public FERPA alignment. Smaller integration set than Caspio.

   Compared to Blaze.tech. Glide is friendlier than Blaze for non-technical users building simple mobile apps, but it is not a contender for the enterprise applications, customer portals, or healthcare workloads where Blaze is positioning, and where Caspio is the right answer.

5. Softr, Fits Frontends on Top of Airtable

   A Blaze.tech alternative considered for quick client portals built on an Airtable base.

   Positioning. Softr is a no-code app builder for applications whose data lives in Airtable, Google Sheets, Softr’s native database, or similar sources. Founded in 2019 in Berlin, it is used for quick client portals.

   Pricing. Free tier (with Softr branding lock-in). Basic $49/month annual (20 users). Professional $139/month annual (100 users). Business $269/month annual (500 users). Enterprise custom. Per-app, per-user, and per-page limits at lower tiers, with custom domains, SQL connections, API calls, and other integrations gated behind higher tiers.

   Best for. A quick client portal on top of an existing Airtable base, when the team is willing to absorb both Softr’s tier limits and Airtable’s record/seat economics.

   Key features and the documented limitation that follows each:

   • Pre-built portal templates, but Softr is block-based, which constrains layouts and styles.
   • Strong Airtable integration, but performance slows on large Airtable bases (per Softr’s own documentation), and the underlying data model still depends on Airtable’s record caps and per-seat costs.
   • Built-in lightweight AI features.
   • Softr Database is now available as a native data source on paid plans, but the depth is light compared to Caspio’s SQL Server backbone.
   • SOC 2 Type II certification at the platform level.
   • Not HIPAA-compliant. Softr does not advertise HIPAA compliance or sign BAAs, making it unsuitable for healthcare applications or any project handling Protected Health Information (PHI).

   Limitations. The native database is light compared to Caspio’s SQL Server backbone, and many apps still rely on Airtable as the source of record, inheriting Airtable’s per-base record caps and per-seat costs. Compliance posture is not enterprise-grade beyond SOC 2 (no FERPA alignment, no HIPAA path). Branding gating on the free tier, custom domains as paid extras, and SQL/API features behind higher tiers create a documented “looks affordable, escalates fast” pattern as user count grows above 100. Smaller integration set than Caspio. No mobile app store publishing path.

   Compared to Blaze.tech. Softr can ship a basic client portal faster if your data already lives in Airtable, but it does not solve for compliance, scale, or true database ownership, and it inherits Airtable’s per-seat economics. Most teams that succeed on Softr eventually outgrow it.

6. Knack, Fits Simple Custom Databases for Small Teams

   A Blaze.tech alternative considered for small to mid-sized teams that need a simple custom database.

   Positioning. Knack is an online database builder for small to mid-sized teams. Founded in 2010 and fully remote, Knack competes with Blaze.tech in the “no-code custom database” segment.

   Pricing. Starter $59/month (monthly) or $49/month (annual). Pro $130/month (monthly) or $110/month (annual). Corporate $300/month (monthly) or $250/month (annual). Enterprise custom. Per-app, per-record, per-user limits at lower tiers. Knack’s most recent price increase took effect November 4, 2025, affecting Pro, Corporate, Plus 1/2/3, and add-on bundles.

   Best for. Small-to-mid teams with bounded record counts that fit within Knack’s tier limits and can tolerate periodic price increases.

   Key features and the documented limitation that follows each:

   • Drag-and-drop builder, with a refreshed “Next-Gen” builder shipped in 2025.
   • SOC 2 Type II certification.
   • HIPAA support delivered through Knack Health, which sits on the Enterprise tier with GovCloud-based infrastructure and a signed BAA. Knack Health plans start at approximately $625/month for HIPAA Core, with HIPAA Enterprise tiers reaching $999+/month.

   Limitations. Per-record pricing is the central scaling issue: invoicing apps, log apps, and any high-row-count workload chew through record allotments quickly, forcing add-ons or tier upgrades. Smaller integration set than Caspio. Narrower AI capability: no MCP server, no AI Assistant for app building. Smaller-scale ceiling.

   Compared to Blaze.tech. Knack is friendlier than Blaze for small teams and lower-volume apps, but for any organization that expects to scale into thousands of end users, regulated workloads, or AI-driven workflows, Knack runs into the same kind of ceiling Blaze does, and Caspio is the better long-term answer.

Blaze.tech Alternatives Comparison

How do these platforms stack up across the dimensions that matter to a mid-market or enterprise buyer? Here is a side-by-side look. Each row pairs the headline attribute with the published limitation behind it.

Where Caspio wins. Caspio is the only platform here that combines unlimited users on every plan, HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II independently certified annually, FERPA alignment, native embeddable apps on your own domain, a Microsoft SQL Server backbone, three AI capabilities (AI-Powered GPT Connect Extension, MCP Server, AI Assistant), and 24/7 human support across all paid plans, backed by a 26-year track record. For organizations evaluating Blaze.tech that need enterprise-grade compliance, scale, and embeddability, Caspio is the clearest upgrade path.

How to Choose a Blaze.tech Alternative: Buyer’s Guide

The best alternative depends on what is actually pushing you off Blaze. A few common scenarios, each with the cost of choosing the alternative:

If you need HIPAA compliance for healthcare apps

Choose Caspio. Caspio’s HIPAA/Compliance Edition is available with BAAs signed at onboarding. Caspio also integrates with Keragon for HIPAA-aligned automation across 300+ healthcare systems. Bubble HIPAA requires a Dedicated or Enterprise contract, and it doesn’t offer a standardized BAA. Retool does not sign a standard BAA per its own Customer-Specific Supplement; HIPAA workloads typically run on self-hosted Retool Enterprise. Glide is not a HIPAA option; its Terms of Service explicitly prohibit storing PHI. Knack HIPAA requires the Enterprise-tier Knack Health plan starting at ~$625/month. Softr does not have a HIPAA workflow.

If you need to scale to thousands or millions of end users

Choose Caspio. Unlimited users on every plan. The math gets brutal on per-seat or per-tier alternatives at scale. A 10,000-user portal on a $5/member-equivalent platform is $600,000/year. On Caspio, that scenario stays at flat platform pricing.

If you need FERPA-aligned compliance for education

Choose Caspio. None of the other alternatives publicly claim FERPA alignment. Caspio is the only platform in this list with a documented education-vertical compliance posture.

If you are building a consumer-facing SaaS MVP

Consider Bubble.io for the prototype, with eyes open. Workload-unit overages routinely push real costs to $200 to $1,500/month, and the 7,000+ plugin marketplace is community-built (only 57 are partner-built) with documented abandonment. When you graduate from MVP into a production application that needs database depth, embeddability into a marketing site, or compliance certifications, Caspio is the natural next stop.

If you are an engineering team building internal admin tools

Consider Retool only if your team writes SQL and JavaScript and you can absorb per-seat costs as the team grows. Source control, direct support, self-hosting, and HIPAA are all gated to Enterprise. Choose Caspio if your team also needs to build customer-facing applications, portals, or applications that embed into your own website with record-level security and compliance certifications.

If you need a quick client portal on top of an existing Airtable base

Consider Softr for the prototype, knowing you also pay Airtable’s per-seat economics and inherit its record caps. Move to Caspio when you outgrow Airtable’s record caps, per-seat costs, and compliance limitations, which most teams do.

If you want one platform for everything

Choose Caspio. One platform, one database backbone, one compliance posture, one integration set, one AI stack, and one support team for the full lifecycle of your business applications. That is the case Blaze tries to make and Caspio actually delivers on.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Blaze.tech and why do buyers look for alternatives?

Blaze.tech is a no-code platform founded in 2022 for building internal tools, customer portals, and AI-assisted business applications. Buyers look for Blaze.tech alternatives when they hit one of three ceilings: compliance breadth (HIPAA only on higher tiers, no public FERPA, less clearly publicized SOC 2 Type II annual independent certification), tiered end-user caps and entry pricing (Internal Apps starts at $1,350/month annual, with external users on Custom only), or vendor maturity concerns for multi-year enterprise contracts.

What is the best Blaze.tech alternative?

The best Blaze.tech alternative for most mid-market and enterprise buyers is Caspio. Caspio combines unlimited users on every plan, HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II independently certified annually, FERPA alignment, embeddable apps and components on your own domain, a Microsoft SQL Server on AWS backbone, three flexible AI capabilities, and a 26-year vendor track record. Other alternatives, Bubble.io, Retool, Glide, Softr, and Knack, each fit narrower buyer profiles with documented trade-offs (workload-cost exposure on Bubble, engineer-required JavaScript on Retool, per-user fees on Glide, Airtable dependency on Softr, per-record limits on Knack)

Is Caspio better than Blaze.tech?

For enterprise applications, regulated industries, and scale workloads, Caspio is the stronger choice. Caspio carries deeper compliance certifications (HIPAA + SOC 2 Type II independently certified annually + FERPA), unlimited end users on every plan instead of tiered caps, native embeddability on your own domain, a Microsoft SQL Server backbone, broader integrations including Keragon for healthcare, and 24/7 human support. Blaze.tech focuses heavily on AI-assisted internal tool building and may be a faster prototyping experience for that narrow use case.

Is Blaze.tech HIPAA compliant?

Blaze.tech offers HIPAA support on its higher-tier plans, signing a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) at upgrade. HIPAA is not available on Blaze’s entry-level tiers. Caspio, by contrast, offers a HIPAA/Compliance Edition that is independently certified annually with a BAA signed at onboarding. For healthcare buyers, the depth of compliance documentation and the annual independent certification cadence are typically the deciding factors.

Blaze.tech vs. Caspio: What is the difference?

Blaze.tech is a 2022-founded no-code platform that markets AI-assisted building of internal tools, with tiered pricing that caps end-user activity. Caspio is a 2000-founded enterprise-grade no-code platform with unlimited users on every plan, HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II independently certified annually, FERPA alignment, native embeddable apps on your own domain, a Microsoft SQL Server on AWS backbone, and three powerful AI capabilities. The practical difference is depth: Caspio is built for production-grade business applications at scale, while Blaze.tech is optimized for prototyping AI-assisted internal tools.

Does Blaze.tech have unlimited users?

No. Blaze.tech tiers cap maker/builder seats and end-user activity, and exceeding tier caps pushes accounts into the next tier. Caspio includes unlimited users on every plan, Team, Business, and Enterprise, with no per-seat fees on builders or end users. For applications that scale into thousands or millions of end users, this is typically the single biggest reason buyers move from Blaze.tech to Caspio.

Which Blaze.tech alternative is best for healthcare?

For most healthcare workloads, Caspio is a strong Blaze.tech alternative. The Caspio HIPAA/Compliance plan is independently certified annually, BAAs are signed at onboarding, and the platform integrates with Keragon for HIPAA-aligned automation across 300+ healthcare systems. SOC 2 Type II annual independent certification, FERPA alignment, FIPS 140-2, and AWS GovCloud hosting options are also part of the standard posture. For teams that specifically require HITRUST e1 certification (a healthcare-prescriptive framework Caspio does not publicly claim), Blaze itself remains relevant. Among the other alternatives in this list: Bubble HIPAA requires a Dedicated or Enterprise contract, without a standardized BAA. Retool does not sign a standard BAA per its Customer-Specific Supplement; HIPAA workloads typically run on self-hosted Retool Enterprise. Glide is not a HIPAA option, as it explicitly prohibits storing PHI. Knack HIPAA requires the Enterprise-tier Knack Health plan (starting at ~$625/month). Softr lacks a HIPAA workflow.

What does Blaze.tech cost vs. Caspio?

Blaze.tech publishes pricing starting at $1,350/month annual (or $1,500/month monthly) on the Internal Apps tier, with external users gated to a custom Enterprise tier. Caspio starts from $300/month for the Team plan, with Business at $600/month, Enterprise custom, and a separate HIPAA/Compliance add-on at $500/month with a 1-year minimum. The bigger cost difference shows up at scale: Blaze caps end-user activity per tier, while Caspio includes unlimited users on every plan. For an application with thousands of end users, Caspio’s flat platform pricing typically delivers significantly lower total cost of ownership.

Move Beyond Blaze.tech. Try Caspio Free for 14 Days.

Blaze.tech may have helped your team prototype an AI-assisted app, but as user counts grow, compliance requirements step up, and roadmaps stretch into multi-year commitments, the platform behind your apps matters more.

Caspio gives teams a no-code foundation for secure, data-driven business applications without per-user math or compliance gating. You get unlimited users on every plan, embeddable apps and components on your own domain, HIPAA compliance and SOC 2 Type II certification, FERPA alignment, a Microsoft SQL Server on AWS backbone, native AI capabilities, and 24/7 human support. Pricing starts at $300/month.

Start a 14-day free trial, explore the platform, or compare plans to see how Caspio fits your next application.

Already comparing other no-code platforms? See:

• Caspio vs. Airtable
• Best Zoho Creator Alternative
• Best Quickbase Alternative for No-Code Apps in 2026
• Best Microsoft Access Alternatives in 2026